Contenido principal del artículo

Kentaro Tomita

Contexto: El arroz de secano (Oryza sativa L.) continúa siendo una opción estratégica para aprovechar ambientes agrícolas con disponibilidad hídrica irregular, aunque su productividad depende de interacciones complejas entre humedad del suelo, sistema de labranza y fertilización nitrogenada. Objetivo: Evaluar el efecto de tres condiciones de suelo, dos sistemas de labranza y cuatro dosis de nitrógeno sobre el rendimiento de grano y la absorción de nutrientes del arroz de secano en la Finca Experimental El Coco, provincia de Coclé, Panamá. Metodología: Se empleó un arreglo factorial 3 × 2 × 4 en bloques completos al azar con cuatro repeticiones. Los factores fueron condición edáfica o hídrica del suelo (seco, medio húmedo y alto húmedo), labranza (cero y convencional) y nitrógeno (0, 30, 60 y 100 kg N/ha). Se midieron velocidad de infiltración, propiedades físico-químicas del suelo, rendimiento de grano y absorción de N, P, K, Fe y Mn a 65 días después de la siembra. Resultados: La fertilización nitrogenada incrementó significativamente el rendimiento y la absorción de nutrientes, con respuesta más marcada en el suelo alto húmedo. El máximo rendimiento fue 3493 kg/ha con 100 kg N/ha y labranza convencional en suelo alto húmedo. En suelo seco, la cero labranza mostró ventaja relativa, probablemente por conservación de humedad y menor perturbación superficial. Conclusiones: La condición de humedad del suelo moduló la respuesta al nitrógeno y a la labranza. En los Llanos de Coclé, el arroz de secano puede ser viable si se ajusta la dosis nitrogenada al ambiente edáfico y se evita extrapolar una recomendación uniforme entre suelos contrastantes.

Context: Upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) remains a strategic option for agricultural environments with irregular water availability, although productivity depends on complex interactions among soil moisture, tillage system and nitrogen fertilization. Objective: To evaluate the effect of three soil conditions, two tillage systems and four nitrogen rates on grain yield and nutrient uptake of upland rice at the El Coco Experimental Farm, Coclé Province, Panama. Method: A 3 × 2 × 4 factorial arrangement was established in randomized complete blocks with four replications. Factors were soil or hydrological condition (dry, medium-moist and high-moist), tillage (zero and conventional) and nitrogen rate (0, 30, 60 and 100 kg N/ha). Infiltration rate, soil physicochemical properties, grain yield and N, P, K, Fe and Mn uptake at 65 days after sowing were assessed. Results: Nitrogen fertilization significantly increased yield and nutrient uptake, with the strongest response in the high-moist soil. The maximum yield was 3493 kg/ha with 100 kg N/ha and conventional tillage in high-moist soil. In dry soil, zero tillage showed a relative advantage, probably because of moisture conservation and lower surface disturbance. Conclusions: Soil moisture condition modulated the response to nitrogen and tillage. In the Coclé Plains, upland rice can be viable when nitrogen rate is adjusted to the edaphic environment and uniform recommendations are not extrapolated across contrasting soils.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
1.
Tomita K. Impacto de suelo, labranza y nitrógeno en rendimiento de arroz de secano en Panamá. Alfa Revista de Investigación en Ciencias Agronómicas y Veterinarias. 2026;10(29):1-13. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistaalfa.v10i29.468
Sección
INVESTIGACIONES
Bookmark and Share
Referencias

Hussain T, Mulla DJ, Hussain N, Qin R, Tahir M, Liu K, et al. Optimizing nitrogen fertilization to enhance productivity and profitability of upland rice using CSM–CERES–Rice. Plants. 2023;12(21):3685. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12213685

Hussain T, Gollany HT, Hussain N, Ahmed M, Tahir M, Duangpan S. Synchronizing nitrogen fertilization and planting date to improve resource use efficiency, productivity, and profitability of upland rice. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:895811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.895811

Nandan R, Singh V, Singh SS, Kumar V, Hazra KK, Nath CP, et al. Impact of conservation tillage in rice-based cropping systems on soil aggregation, carbon pools and nutrients. Geoderma. 2019;340:104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.001

Alou IN, van der Laan M, Annandale JG, Steyn JM. Water and nitrogen use efficiency of upland rice (Oryza sativa L. × Oryza glaberrima Steud) under varying N application rates. Nitrogen. 2020;1(2):151-166. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen1020013

Rakotoson T, Dusserre J, Letourmy P, Ramonta IR, Cao TV, Ramanantsoanirina A, et al. Genetic variability of nitrogen use efficiency in rainfed upland rice. Field Crops Res. 2017;213:194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.07.023

Saito K, Linquist B, Atlin G, Phanthaboon K, Shiraiwa T, Horie T. Response of traditional and improved upland rice cultivars to N and P fertilizer in northern Laos. Field Crops Res. 2006;96(2-3):216-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.07.003

Fageria NK, de Morais OP, dos Santos AB. Nitrogen use efficiency in upland rice genotypes. J Plant Nutr. 2010;33(11):1696-1711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2010.496892

Dossou-Yovo ER, Brüggemann N, Jesse N, Huat J, Ago EE, Agbossou EK. Reducing soil CO2 emission and improving upland rice yield with no-tillage, straw mulch and nitrogen fertilization in northern Benin. Soil Tillage Res. 2016;156:44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.10.001

Dossou-Yovo ER, Brüggemann N, Ampofo E, Igue AM, Jesse N, Huat J, et al. Combining no-tillage, rice straw mulch and nitrogen fertilizer application to increase the soil carbon balance of upland rice field in northern Benin. Soil Tillage Res. 2016;163:152-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.05.019

Alou I, Steyn J, Annandale J, van der Laan M. Growth, phenological, and yield response of upland rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nerica 4®) to water stress during different growth stages. Agric Water Manag. 2018;198:39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.005

Prasertsak A, Fukai S. Nitrogen availability and water stress interaction on rice growth and yield. Field Crops Res. 1997;52(3):249-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00016-6

Castillo EG, Tuong TP, Singh U, Inubushi K, Padilla J. Drought response of dry-seeded rice to water stress timing and N-fertilizer rates and sources. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2006;52(4):496-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00064.x

Kondo M, Murty MV, Aragones DV. Characteristics of root growth and water uptake from soil in upland rice and maize under water stress. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2000;46(3):721-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2000.10409137

Belder P, Bouman BAM, Spiertz JHJ, Peng S, Castañeda AR, Visperas RM. Crop performance, nitrogen and water use in flooded and aerobic rice. Plant Soil. 2005;273(1-2):167-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-7401-4

Yan J, Wu Q, Qi D, Zhu J. Rice yield, water productivity, and nitrogen use efficiency responses to nitrogen management strategies under supplementary irrigation for rain-fed rice cultivation. Agric Water Manag. 2022;263:107486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107486

Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Shi Y, Yu Z. Optimized split nitrogen fertilizer increase photosynthesis, grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and water use efficiency under water-saving irrigation. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):20310. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75388-9

Djaman K, Mel VC, Diop L, Sow A, El-Namaky R, Manneh B, et al. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation regime and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in the Sahel. Water. 2018;10(6):711. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060711

Mboyerwa P, Kibret K, Mtakwa P, Aschalew A. Evaluation of growth, yield, and water productivity of paddy rice with water-saving irrigation and optimization of nitrogen fertilization. Agronomy. 2021;11(8):1629. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081629

Chen K, Yu S, Ma T, Ding J, He P, Dai Y, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen management on water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and leaching loss in rice paddies. Water. 2022;14(10):1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14101596

Crusciol CAC, Soratto RP, Nascente AS, Arf O. Root distribution, nutrient uptake, and yield of two upland rice cultivars under two water regimes. Agron J. 2013;105(1):237-247. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0298

Sandar MM, Ruangsiri M, Chutteang C, Arunyanark A, Toojinda T, Siangliw JL. Root characterization of Myanmar upland and lowland rice in relation to agronomic and physiological traits under drought stress condition. Agronomy. 2022;12(5):1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051230

Lou D, Chen Z, Yu D, Yang X. SAPK2 contributes to rice yield by modulating nitrogen metabolic processes under reproductive stage drought stress. Rice. 2020;13(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-020-00395-3

Islam MA, Bell RW, Johansen C, Jahiruddin M, Haque ME, Vance W. Conservation agriculture practice influences soil organic carbon pools in intensive rice-based systems of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain. Soil Use Manag. 2022;38(2):1217-1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12798

Dhaliwal J, Kahlon MS, Kukal SS. Deep tillage and irrigation impacts on soil water balance and water productivity of direct-seeded rice-wheat cropping system in north-west India. Soil Res. 2020;58(5):498-508. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR20018

Van Reuler H, Janssen B. The influence of soil phosphorus, pH and texture on the uptake of phosphorus from soil and fertilizer by upland rice. NJAS. 1996;44(4):249-261. https://doi.org/10.18174/njas.v44i4.536